• Home
  • Movies
  • Music
  • TV
  • Video Games
  • Wrestling
  • Topics
  • Latest Comments on Cult of Whatever
Search
Cult of Whatever logo
  • Movies
    Featured
    • The Living Daylights: Timothy Dalton as James Bond

      The Living Daylights is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 28, 2022
      Movie Blogs
    Recent
    • The Muppet Christmas Carol: Michael Caine as Scrooge

      The Muppet’s Christmas Carol remains the gold standard for the book

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 20, 2022
    • Nightmare Before Christmas 1993 1

      2022’s Christmas Movie Watchlist!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 18, 2022
    • Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio Poster

      REVIEW: GDT’s Pinocchio is my favorite film of the year!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 14, 2022
    • Troll: Ine Marie Wilmann as Nora

      REVIEWS: TROLL and TROLL HUNTER -A giant creature double feature!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 5, 2022
    • Harry with The Hendersons

      Harry and the Hendersons is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2022
    • Fantastic Four Poster

      The five best “rogues galleries” in superherodom! (part 3)

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 28, 2022
  • Music
    Random
    • Johnny Cash Cover

      Johnny Cash: The American Storyteller

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 2, 2015
      Music Blogs
    Recent
    • The Beatles: Get Back

      What GET BACK reveals about the Beatles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 15, 2021
    • Simon And Garfunkel at Feyenoord Stadium in Rotterdam1982

      The Boxer is a song about being conned

      By Matthew Martin
      | July 4, 2021
    • Lady Gaga: Chromatica Album Cover

      Lady Gaga’s discography is totally out of order

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 3, 2021
    • Michael Jackson Thriller Album Cover

      Thirty years ago music fans said “Nevermind” to Michael Jackson

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 21, 2021
    • Queen II Album Cover

      On Queen’s The Miracle, and the importance of track ordering

      By Matthew Martin
      | February 16, 2021
    • Linda Paul Mccartney 1976

      50 years ago, McCartney dropped “Lennon” and went solo…

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 5, 2020
  • TV
    Featured
    • Big Sky S03e05: Kylie Bunbury, J. Anthony Pena and Katheryn Winnick as Cassie Dewell, Mo Poppernak and Jenny Hoyt

      Big Sky S03E05 Review: Flesh and Blood - Glamping!

      By Salome G
      | October 22, 2022
      TV Blogs
    Recent
    • Big Sky S03e10: Gang

      Big Sky S03E10 Review: A Thin Layer of Rock – Break time…

      By Salome G
      | December 11, 2022
    • Rick And Morty: S01e03

      Is Beth from Rick and Morty a bigger sociopath than Rick?

      By Jason Collins
      | December 7, 2022
    • Big Sky S03e09: Dedee Pfeiffer and Cree as Denise and Emily

      Big Sky S03E09: Where There’s Smoke There’s Fire – Stalling

      By Salome G
      | December 1, 2022
    • The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special: Dave Bautista and Pom Klementieff as Drax and Mantis

      REVIEW: The GOTG Holiday Special is a sweet prelude to next year’s finale

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 27, 2022
    • The Midnight Club S01: The Gang

      The Midnight Club S1 Review – A series of unfortunate events

      By Salome G
      | November 24, 2022
    • Big Sky S03e08: Reba McEntire as Sunny Barnes

      Big Sky S03E08 Review: Duck Hunting – I love a weirdo.

      By Salome G
      | November 19, 2022
  • Video Games
    Featured
    • Arkham Knight

      Batman: Arkham Knight - A fitting end to a trilogy

      By Tom Farr
      | July 18, 2015
      Video Game Reviews
    Recent
    • Splatoon 3 Screenshot

      A trio of Nintendo Switch reviews!

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 28, 2022
    • Nintendo Switch Logo

      Looking ahead to the Switch 2: Predictions and Wants

      By Matthew Martin
      | August 15, 2022
    • Legend Of Zelda

      Can a Legend of Zelda movie work?

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 6, 2022
    • Super Mario 64

      Which system had the better launch: A battle of four Nintendo consoles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2021
    • Luigi's Mansion

      Happy twentieth to Nintendo’s underrated gem, the Gamecube

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 18, 2021
    • Metroid Dread

      Metroid Dread – Post Game analysis and sequel needs

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 29, 2021
  • Wrestling
    Featured
    • AEW All Out 2022: Keith Lee. Anthony Bowens, Max Caster and Billy Gunn

      AEW All Out 2022 - Review and (wild) Speculation!

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 5, 2022
      AEW
    Recent
    • WWE WrestleMania 38: Cody Rhodes vs. Seth Rollins

      Was 2022 the wildest year in wrestling history?

      By Matthew Martin
      | January 4, 2023
    • AEW Full Gear 2022: Young Bucks and Kenny Omega Elite Entrance

      AEW Full Gear 2022 – A needed reset at the end of a tough year

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 22, 2022
    • WWE Survivor Series 1997: Bret Hart

      The Montreal Screwjob – Twenty Five Years Later

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 8, 2022
    • AEW Grand Slam 2022: Jungle Boy and Rey Fenix

      AEW GRANDSLAM 2022 showcased the present and future of the promotion

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 25, 2022
    • AEW All Out 2022: CM Punk

      AEW All Out Fall Out: All the CM Punk drama that’s fit to print!

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 5, 2022
    • AEW Dark: Ricky Starks (22/09/20)

      The future of the AEW World Championship

      By Matthew Martin
      | August 14, 2022
  • Topics
    • site logo
    Latest
    • Was 2022 the wildest year in wrestling history?
    • The Muppet's Christmas Carol remains the gold standard for the book
    • 2022's Christmas Movie Watchlist!
    • REVIEW: GDT's Pinocchio is my favorite film of the year!
    • Big Sky S03E10 Review: A Thin Layer of Rock - Break time...
    • Is Beth from Rick and Morty a bigger sociopath than Rick?

    REVIEW: Jurassic World: Lost Kingdom…uh…sigh…

    By Matthew Martin
    | June 24, 2018
    Movie Reviews

    Well…there were dinosaurs.

    But after four movies already, plus an assortment of King Kong films over the years (which are obligated to feature a T-Rex), not to mention a handful of Godzilla movies, is it really a novelty anymore?

    When the first Jurassic Park premiered (we just looked back on it, by the way!) it was right in the sweet spot era of computer-generated effects. Things would only get more realistic of course, but things had progressed enough to be realistic enough to look…well, real, for the first time. And sure, Jurassic Park uses every trick in the book to bring their dinosaurs to life, but CGI played a big part in it and helped make a movie whose effects still hold up today.

    Twenty-five years later there simply is no novelty anymore. It’s old hat. You show me a dinosaur on the screen and it’s just another cool effect. That’s jaded and cynical, sure, but…well, there it is. In order for this series to succeed in the 21st century it needed to rethink things; you can’t keep going back to the island and having crazy things go wrong. That idea was worn out as early as The Lost World in 1997.

    When Jurassic World premiered a few years ago, it did so with a huge wellspring of hype. It dropped right in the sweet spot of the nostalgia age, where ticket-buyers were eager to return to the movies of their youth, no matter how derivative they might be.

    And boy was Jurassic World derivative.

    Was it fun? Sure. Was it stupid? You bet. But was it fun? I already said it was.

    When we reviewed it, we gave it a solid 8/10. I stand by that rating, despite how the movie has certainly not aged well over the past three years. As I watched the sequel I remembered some points I made then and how they were still relevant in the follow-up.

    For example, about the first Jurassic World, I said this:

    I had hoped that the explanation/exposition-heavy dialogue would be contained to the trailers. But nope, that’s 90% of the dialogue in the movie too.

    The original movie had exposition as well, but of course that film was fresh and original and intriguing. People wanted to know what was going on, and Spielberg paced the movie so that the explanations were punctuated by some great character moments that managed to feed into the plot: Dr. Malcom would hit a zinger that would reinforce the “man messing with nature” theme, John Hammond would have a great line that showed how obtuse he was while trying to play god. Those lines moved the story forward. The exposition in this film just moved in circles and stalled the movie.

    So my biggest knock on the film may be something that you don’t mind; not everyone cares about dialogue when they go to an event film. If that’s you then you’re going to love this movie, because for me the biggest knock against it was the unnecessary cheese. All of the necessary cheese was done brilliantly, and when the characters stopped talking and started running the film soared. The thrills, moments of horror, exciting action scenes all worked just as they should. But when the characters stopped to “reflect” or to “discuss” or to “ramble on about the meaning” or “the plan,” that’s then things started to falter.

    And also this, which I think is the most important take-away from the first Jurassic World movie…

    This movie is secretly a satire on the state of Hollywood Franchises.

    No one comes out and derides the “bigger and more everything” premise behind the plot, so either it was a subtle message from the director or I’m just crazy. But the entire idea behind Jurassic Wold, the in-movie theme park, is that the attractions have to get bigger and bigger to the point of ridiculousness. At one point it is stated that crowds are no longer “wowed” by dinosaurs, in a line I couldn’t decide if it was directed at the fictional ticket-buyers in the movie, or real ticket-buyers to the movies. The idea that people would get bored of dinosaurs seems outlandish until you consider the diminishing box office returns of the original Jurassic Park trilogy. The first one grossed over a billion dollars (pushed passed a billion through re-releases), the sequel brought in over 600mm and the third one did half of that, with 360mm.

    Both of the original sequels tried to up the ante, but missed what worked: The Lost World brought a T-Rex to San Francisco, to terrorize a huge populace, because the studio thought bringing the action closer to home would resonate more. JP3 introduced a dinosaur (Spinosaurus) more ferocious than Rex because the studio execs thought the old was out of style. The violence ramped up again and again, as did the body count, but along the way the audience lost interest. So for fifteen years the franchise sat dormant. Now it’s back and the original sequels have been de-canonized in order to bring us a movie with more people to be terrorized, a dinosaur more ferocious than the T-Rex, more violence, more horror, and more death, all because the fictional “corporate” big wigs behind the theme park are worried about the audience losing interest.

    This isn’t a Jurassic Park movie. This is a movie about the Jurassic Park movies.

    Even the charismatic foreign tycoon funding the whole thing is a parody of the generic hollywood exec, so sure of his own genius when it’s the guys doing the dirty work that deserve the credit. This guy gets a hilarious moment late in the film when he approaches his personal helicopter, intending to fly it over the park in order to shoot down the antagonizing dinosaur villain of the picture. As he gets to the chopper, a worker shouts at him “Isn’t there anyone else who can fly that?” And then he turns around, as dramatic music swells, and the camera zooms in, and he replies “We don’t need anyone else.”

    I laughed out loud, but I don’t know if it was supposed to be a parody or if that was supposed to be a serious, dramatic moment. Surely not, because five minutes later that chopper was going down in flames.

    Throughout the movie, the scientists, park promoters, etc, all kept talking up the Indominus Rex (“Indominus” from the Latin meaning “unable to be dominated” or “unable to be trained”) as this Dino that was “so way cooler than the T-Rex, for reals.” They spent a lot of time trying to convince you of that too, even starting the “oh crap it’s loose” story a lot earlier than I thought they would, just to have more time to establish the terror this I-Rex can cause.  But in the end, who stands tall? Who has the last word roar? Whose face is on the logo? In fact the whole movie was a love letter to the T-Rex and the Raptor, the unquestioned stars of the first film. Like Hollywood, it was obsessed with rebooting, restarting, reimagining, but in the end it always goes back to the old favorite, because that’s where the emotional connection lies.

    Now looking back on the first World movie, I don’t know for sure if writer/director Colin Trevorrow was trying to make a film that was actually about dumb Hollywood reboots, but if he wasn’t then he’s a hack. If he was…he’s Ed Wood? Is that better?

    Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom Poster

    All I know is when I sat down for the sequel I wondered if they would try and do another secret satire. Now that I’ve seen it…no, they did not. Jurassic World 2 is somehow two half-baked movies shoved together. It’s the beginning of a by the book Jurassic World sequel, one that goes back to the island but with more stakes, more action, more blah blah blah. And then, following ten minutes of mind-numbing exposition, it’s the second half of a different Jurassic World sequel, one that would have been about something new, something that would have moved the franchise forward, away from the island and to a true “world” setting.

    Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom 1

    Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom 2

    But instead of taking those two ideas and making two fully-fleshed out movies, writer Trevorrow took the first half of the first idea and the second half of the second idea and stitched them together, much the way the mad scientists in the movie keep trying to stitch together new dinosaurs from existing parts OH CRAP IT IS A SATIRE! IT’S A SPOOF OF THE PREVIOUS MOVIE’S OWN INANE PLOT!

    COLIN TREVORROW. YOU GENIUS!

    6/10 – It’s not great, though. The writing is bad, the acting wooden. The action only occasionally thrilling, and the emotional beats completely devoid of emotional resonance.

    I expected nothing and I’m still let down.

    (It’ll make a billion dollars)

    Share this article:

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit

    Tags

    Adventure MoviesJurassic ParkJurassic World

    COMMENTS

    Please read our Commenting Policy before you join in with the discussion.

    Note: If you have email notifications enabled, please check your email spam folders to ensure emails are not missed.

    Subscribe
    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    Notify of
    guest

    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    guest

    15 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    JJFletcher
    JJFletcher
    4 years ago

    For me the excitement of these movies is just no longer there. Maybe I’ve just grown out of them but I remember being so incredibly excited to see the very first one and being scared for weeks. Granted the CGI is great, the acting and story just aren’t that good.

    0
    Reply
    Mr Jobs
    Mr Jobs
    4 years ago

    Must see movie 🙂

    0
    Reply
    Rebel
    Rebel
    4 years ago

    May I be the one who will go against the flow here? I won’t go so much into the detail of the story as I try to enjoy the dinosaurs themselves. I felt like I was a little kid seeing new dinosaurs in a zoo. How I wish there will come a time when real dinosaurs, the vegans, can be reanimated in life.

    0
    Reply
    Bigfoot
    Bigfoot
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Rebel

    Good for you and I actually enjoyed the technical part of the movie because of the CGI enhancement. However, the actors and the story didn’t do justice to the cunning work of the programmers who made the dinosaurs come life.

    0
    Reply
    surfari
    surfari
    4 years ago

    I haven’t seen this one yet but I can’t say that I’m surprised it’s less than great. While the parody aspects of Jurassic World made it more enjoyable than it would have been otherwise, I just wasn’t all too thrilled by it either. I don’t know. I guess I’m a purist.

    0
    Reply
    Bigfoot
    Bigfoot
    4 years ago
    Reply to  surfari

    I agree with you. The comeback of the dinosaurs in the Jurassic World is outstanding because of the addition of modern technology into the mix. The CGI part were nicely done compared to the old mechanical dinosaurs of the Jurassic Park trilogy.

    The narrative in the sequel of the Jurassic World doesn’t have a strong plot to stand on its own.

    0
    Reply
    surfari
    surfari
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Bigfoot

    Exactly. The technology/CGI is obviously superior to the older movies, but that’s just not enough to make a better movie. I thought the plot was weak in the first Jurassic World, so it’s not surprising to me that the narrative in the sequel of what is essentially a sequel isn’t great either.

    That being said, I’m sure I’ll end up seeing this at some point, but mainly because I feel bad talking trash about something I’ve never seen.

    0
    Reply
    Bigfoot
    Bigfoot
    4 years ago
    Reply to  surfari

    Judging a book by the cover, as they say. However, when many people who read the book has a negative comment about it then we tend to go along with it. Still, it is not as bad as Solo, in my simple opinion.

    0
    Reply
    Micah
    Micah
    4 years ago

    I couldn’t understand why they have to save the dinosaurs on the island wherein they can reanimate again using the DNA’s they currently have. It will take some time to recreate those dinosaurs, but at least they don’t need to go through the life-threatening rescue.

    0
    Reply
    Eversleigh
    Eversleigh
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Micah

    Yes! It was absolute nonsense and drove me bonkers. Even if by some measure their usual process was no longer viable, some brainiac scientists managed to perform the magic before when it was supposed to be impossible, so they can surely figure it out again. I kept waiting for this whole thing to be explained away like maybe the big cheese stood to lose too much money if he started fresh, so of course it’s okay to sacrifice people for big bucks. Any explanation, no matter how thin, is better than expecting the audience to comply with the suspension of… Read more »

    0
    Reply
    Micah
    Micah
    4 years ago
    Reply to  Eversleigh

    People can be replaced, not the dinosaurs. This is what the story is telling us. Do you remember the auction scene? These are wild things and anything can go wrong and it did go wrong.

    If I’m the evil genius of the movie, I would place the dinosaurs on a deserted island, let’s say the Komodo Island, and let the buyers see the product on a yacht away from the island.

    0
    Reply
    Bigfoot
    Bigfoot
    4 years ago

    More fangs, more roars, and that’s about it. If I will make a review about this movie, then my first sentence would be it. I liked the previous Jurassic Park trilogy even with less appealing graphics because the story was solid.

    0
    Reply
    callmeishmael
    callmeishmael
    4 years ago

    I was pretty disappointed too. I didn’t have very high expectations (I rarely do for sequels) and it still didn’t manage to meet them. Everything about it seemed force. I’m glad that they had Claire (mostly) ditch her heel this time around. I am one of those people who couldn’t get over that in the first one.

    0
    Reply
    MidNight
    MidNight
    4 years ago

    Watching this one just for the children and I share your overall sentiment. Some of the scenes were meant to be full of suspense, but instead I shook my head at how illogical and boring they were. I walked out of the theater hoping that we would not see more genetic experiments of these animals. We all deserve some peace.

    0
    Reply
    Eversleigh
    Eversleigh
    4 years ago

    I liked all the other movies in this franchise, but this one felt like an old, cheesy sci-fi film but with bigger explosions. The plot was just silly. It’s absurd to think that these scientists didn’t expect hybrid creatures to be more dangerous and it’s hard to root for fools who rush into volcano/dinosaur mayhem.

    0
    Reply

    You might also like

    • Jurassic Park is still awesome, twenty-five years later…

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 23, 2018
    • REVIEW: Star Lord and the Raptor Pack. Brought to you by Mercedes.

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 14, 2015
    • REVIEW: ANNIHILATION is simply mesmerizing (with or without spoilers)

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 5, 2018
    • REVIEW: Ready Player One is Willy Wonka and the Nostalgia Factory

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 1, 2018
    • REVIEW: Jumanji – Welcome to the Jungle is…good enough

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 22, 2017
    • Review: Valerian City Thousand blah blah blah nerp

      By Matthew Martin
      | July 22, 2017

    FIND THE TOPICS YOU WANT...

    Movie Topics

    Recommended for you

    • REVIEW: GDT’s Pinocchio is my favorite film of the year!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 14, 2022
    • REVIEWS: TROLL and TROLL HUNTER -A giant creature double feature!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 5, 2022
    • Harry and the Hendersons is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2022
    • The five best “rogues galleries” in superherodom! (part 3)

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 28, 2022
    • Spirited Away remains Studio Ghibli’s “greatest” film

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 16, 2022
    • Read the Book Instead: The most disappointing book-to-film adaptations

      By Oliver Johnston
      | September 20, 2021
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Affiliate Disclosure
    • Cookie Policy and Settings
    • Terms of Use
    • Photo Credits
    • RSS
    All Cult of Whatever articles, logos, illustrations and graphics are copyright CultOfWhatever.com. All other trademarks, logos and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. © 2021 CultOfWhatever. All Rights Reserved.
    • facebook
    • twitter
    wpDiscuz