• Home
  • Movies
  • Music
  • TV
  • Video Games
  • Wrestling
  • Topics
  • Latest Comments
Search
Cult of Whatever logo
  • Movies
    Featured
    • The Living Daylights: Timothy Dalton as James Bond

      The Living Daylights is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 28, 2022
      Movie Blogs
    Recent
    • Jurassic World Dominion Logo

      REVIEW: Jurassic World Dominion – Here we go again…again

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 12, 2022
    • Three Men and a Baby: Tom Selleck and Ted Danson

      Three Men and a Baby is still awesome thirty five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 31, 2022
    • The Bob's Burgers Movie Poster

      REVIEW: Bob’s Burgers The Movie is Bob’s Burgers The Show, which means it’s great

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 28, 2022
    • Top Gun Maverick: Tom Cruise

      REVIEW: Top Gun Maverick is a sequel that soars!

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 27, 2022
    • Star Wars New Hope Mark Hamill Carrie Fisher Harrison Ford Luke Skywalker Princess Leia Han Solo

      Star Wars: 45 Years Later and the four people who made it happen

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 23, 2022
    • Chip 'N Dale Rescue Rangers Poster

      REVIEW: Chip n Dale: Rescue Rangers is a fever dream of family fun

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 22, 2022
  • Music
    Random
    • Lady Gaga: Chromatica Album Cover

      Lady Gaga's discography is totally out of order

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 3, 2021
      Music Blogs
    Recent
    • The Beatles: Get Back

      What GET BACK reveals about the Beatles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 15, 2021
    • Simon And Garfunkel at Feyenoord Stadium in Rotterdam1982

      The Boxer is a song about being conned

      By Matthew Martin
      | July 4, 2021
    • Michael Jackson Thriller Album Cover

      Thirty years ago music fans said “Nevermind” to Michael Jackson

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 21, 2021
    • Queen II Album Cover

      On Queen’s The Miracle, and the importance of track ordering

      By Matthew Martin
      | February 16, 2021
    • Linda Paul Mccartney 1976

      50 years ago, McCartney dropped “Lennon” and went solo…

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 5, 2020
    • Beatles Usa 1964

      50 years ago the Beatles said “The End”

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 31, 2019
  • TV
    Featured
    • Nancy Drew S03e01: Kennedy McMann as Nancy

      Nancy Drew S03E01 Review: The Warning of the Frozen Heart - Uh-oh!

      By Salome G
      | October 10, 2021
      TV Blogs
    Recent
    • Roswell, New Mexico S04e03: Sibongile Mlambo, Lily Cowles and Michael Trevino as Anatsa, Isobel and Kyle

      Roswell, New Mexico S04E03 Review: Subterranean Homesick Alien – Treading water?

      By Salome G
      | June 23, 2022
    • Obi-Wan Kenobi Series: Ewan McGregor and Vivien Lyra Blair as Obi-Wan and Leia

      REVIEW: Obi-Wan Kenobi had a good season and little else

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 22, 2022
    • Evil S03e02: Sohina Sidhu and Aasif Mandvi as Karima and Ben Shakir

      Evil S03E02 Review: The Demon of Memes – Delightfully creepy

      By Salome G
      | June 20, 2022
    • Dark Winds S01e02: Jessica Matten as Bernadette Manuelito

      Dark Winds S01E02 Review: The Male Rain Approaches – Loose threads

      By Salome G
      | June 20, 2022
    • Riverdale S06e17: Madelaine Petsch, Camila Mendes and Lili Reinhart as Cheryl, Veronica and Betty

      Riverdale S06E17 Review: American Psychos – Bored

      By Salome G
      | June 18, 2022
    • Star Trek Strange New Worlds S01e06: Ian Ho and Husein Madhavji as First Servant and Elder Gamal

      Star Trek: Strange New Worlds – Episodes 6-7 review (the best and the not-so best)

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 18, 2022
  • Video Games
    Featured
    • Arkham Knight

      Batman: Arkham Knight - A fitting end to a trilogy

      By Tom Farr
      | July 18, 2015
      Video Game Reviews
    Recent
    • Legend Of Zelda

      Can a Legend of Zelda movie work?

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 6, 2022
    • Super Mario 64

      Which system had the better launch: A battle of four Nintendo consoles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2021
    • Luigi's Mansion

      Happy twentieth to Nintendo’s underrated gem, the Gamecube

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 18, 2021
    • Metroid Dread

      Metroid Dread – Post Game analysis and sequel needs

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 29, 2021
    • Mario Headphones

      The SNES Turns 30: A look at some of the system’s best soundtracks

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 22, 2021
    • Metroid Dread Poster

      REVIEW: Metroid Dread reawakens the old gamer in me

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 11, 2021
  • Wrestling
    Featured
    • Wwe Payback 2017 Poster 2

      Your SO OF COURSE preview of WWE Payback 2017

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 30, 2017
      WWE Blogs
    Recent
    • AEW Double or Nothing 2022: CM Punk vs Adam Page

      REVIEW: AEW Double or Nothing 2022 delivered an up-and-down show

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 30, 2022
    • MJF on AEW Dynamite 17th November 2021

      Getting AEW to the next level…

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 29, 2022
    • Raw 210501: Triple H and Stephanie McMahon

      May 21, 2001 – A (forgotten) date that will live in WWE infamy

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 20, 2022
    • WWE WrestleMania 39 Logo

      Your WAY TOO EARLY predictions for WWE WrestleMania 39!

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 20, 2022
    • WWE WrestleMania 38 Poster

      Your SO OF COURSE preview of WWE WRESTLEMANIA 38!

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 30, 2022
    • Wrestlemania 31 Paige Aj Lee 2

      BOOK REVIEW: The Women of WrestleMania is a balanced take on an under-valued slice of history

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 16, 2022
  • Topics
    • site logo
    Latest
    • Roswell, New Mexico S04E03 Review: Subterranean Homesick Alien - Treading water?
    • REVIEW: Obi-Wan Kenobi had a good season and little else
    • Evil S03E02 Review: The Demon of Memes - Delightfully creepy
    • Dark Winds S01E02 Review: The Male Rain Approaches - Loose threads
    • Riverdale S06E17 Review: American Psychos - Bored
    • Star Trek: Strange New Worlds - Episodes 6-7 review (the best and the not-so best)
    • Latest Comments

    Lesson learned: Four observations from the Fantastic Four fallout

    By Matthew Martin
    | August 30, 2015
    Movie Blogs

    Fantastic 4

    It will go down as the biggest bomb of the year, with the studio, actors, and even the director totally disowning it. In an era where comic book movies are frequently at the top of the box office charts, an adaptation of one of the original comic book teams, as well as the first Stan Lee/Marvel superhero property, had no reason to do so poorly. Yet here we are, at the end of August, after almost a month in theaters, and Fantastic Four is sitting at about 50 million dollars in domestic gross (with another 80 million or so in international markets). On the last Wednesday of the month, it made only 250,000 dollars. It’s one-month Friday totals have dropped from 11 million to 2 million to 1 million to half a million. That’s a staggering drop, particularly from the first weekend to the next.

    For comparison, the biggest movie of the year (pre-Star Wars), Jurassic World, opened to an 80 million dollar Friday, then pulled in 30 million on its second Friday. It made 14 million on its third Friday and it wasn’t until it’s second month in theaters that it–on it’s fourth Friday–made as much as Fantastic Four did on its opening night. Jurassic World had it’s last million-plus day in theaters on August 2nd, a full two months after release. Fantastic Four stopped pulling in over a million dollars on August 24th, seventeen days after release.

    Months ago, before the troubles in the film’s production started to dominate the trade papers, Fox announced a sequel to Fantastic Four was already greenlit and would be released in 2017. That seems beyond foolish at this point, and though the studio has not revised its schedule, it’s likely they haven’t publicly changed their plans as a face-saving move. Fox’s deal with Marvel means that the studio must release a movie based on the F4 property in a seven year window or the rights to the characters will return to its parent company. It doesn’t seem likely, however, that there will be any money in Fantastic Four any time soon, and certainly not within the seven year window that Fox has to work with.

    Looking back at the disaster that the movie was, there are some lessons that can be learned. Fox was not the only party responsible for the failure of this production, both they and director Josh Trank share the burden. Nevertheless, the collapse of Fantastic Four reveals some hard truths that all studios in the comic business (namely Disney, Fox, and to a lesser extent Sony) need to realize going forward…

    LESSON ONE: THERE NEVER WAS A COMIC BOOK MOVIE NOVELTY

    Studio executives are a predictable lot: They are desperate to find something that will bring them a huge hit, but terrified to try anything new. They are quick to run down their competition, but they’re even quicker to copy the latest trend. Comic Book movies used to be a joke in tinseltown. Kevin Smith, who worked for a time on the ill-fated Superman Lives project, once remarked that Warners should bring in some of DC’s best writers to adapt Superman into a screenplay. The logic was sound: Warners owns DC, has access to all the best Superman stories and writers, so why not put them all together to make the best “Superman” movie possible? The studio’s response? “Yeah but those are comic book guys…” As though a comic book writer would be out of his element in writing a comic book movie. Times have changed, and that change happened because someone had the courage to do something different.

    When Marvel studios launched Iron Man, and with it, their own film-making studio, the response from other studios was one of derision. No one had ever taken comic books so seriously before. Marginal improvements had been made, certainly (Fox’s X-Men movies were at least a “serious” take, and Sony made billions with their bright and lively Spider-Man movies), but nothing to the scope of Marvel Studios’ ambitions. Fox had already tried to launch a Fantastic Four series, with two films in the mid-2000’s, but their lukewarm response was shrugged off at the time (those were the pre-MCU days). It was assumed X-Men was the exception to the rule that comic book movies wouldn’t work. Iron Man and Marvel proved otherwise.

    Once Iron Man became a success, suddenly everyone was on the superhero bandwagon. DC finally got off the pot and decided to kickstart their own universe, Sony rebooted Spider-Man, and Fox dreamed of their own shared universe between their properties: Fantastic Four and X-Men. No one stopped to consider the diminishing returns that come with derivative works. Chris Nolan’s Batman movies were hugely successful because they were well made movies. Marvel’s movies have likewise followed the pattern of “quality=profit.” A lesser movie like “Thor: The Dark World” under-performed compared to the sublime Guardians of the Galaxy, despite the former property being much more well known. Fans weren’t paying big bucks to see “comic book movies;” they were paying big bucks to see “GOOD comic book movies.”

    It is a myth to say that comic book movies were a novelty that has now worn off. No. Comic book movies were never popular just for being comic book movies. Green Lantern, the aforementioned Fantastic Four and F4: Rise of the Silver Surfer, and the rebooted Amazing Spider-Man films are proof of that. If anything has worn off, it is the derivative “they did this, let’s do that too” mindset from lazy studio executives. Buyers never saw comic movies as a novelty; studio heads saw them as a novelty. And despite the aforementioned lesser failures over the years, it has taken the huge failure of this movie to show that you can’t just toss out a movie with the title of a comic property (in the last year you have the rights to that property) and expect ticket buyers to shell out money to see it.

    It doesn’t work like that. You need a plan. You need a focus. You need a vision…

    LESSON TWO: IF YOU HIRE A GUY WITH A VISION, YOU ARE HIRING A VISION

    So Fox, seeing the dollars being generated by Marvel’s films,  as well as seeing Warners and DC begin their own cinematic universe, decided to resurrect the only other major Marvel property they had. Because Fox actually hates their properties (more on that later), they hired a director with the express purpose of shaking up the Fantastic Four concept and giving viewers something “different.” To that end, they hired Josh Trank, a small time director with only one major film credit, the well made “Chronicle” film, which put a spin on the “superhero” genre by attaching a found footage trope to it (another concept that Hollywood has run into the ground) and mixing in some emo angst.

    By all accounts, Fox brought in Trank and offered him Fantastic Four. They sought him out. Trank (an admitted non-fan of the property) pointed to Chronicle and said “I want to do that.” Fox gave him the thumbs-up and off he went. To his credit, Trank had a defined vision. That’s more than can be said for Fox. All Fox had was a deadline: By 2015 the movie must be released or the rights go back to Marvel. Trank set out to make a small, confined, dour film, about young people who are infected with warped abilities and used by the government before discovering their own potential and going out on their own. It sounds like a great sequel to Chronicle, but it doesn’t sound like a very good Fantastic Four film.

    And yet, in an earlier time, this is the kind of movie that would have been encouraged. Look at Tim Burton’s proposed take on Superman: It was nothing like the comic, because in those days no one wanted to be like the comics. Even Burton’s adored Batman movies took huge departures from the source material, nevermind the work Joel Schumacher did with the character. That was the era. That was normal. Trank’s idea of a F4 movie would have fit right in back in those days. In those days superheros on film looked like this:

    Batgirl Batman Robin

    These days they look like this:

    Ben Affleck Batman

    But worse than hiring a guy with a vision, is hiring a guy with a vision and then fighting he and his vision every step of the way. Having a focused idea is good to give the movie an identity. Even if fans reject that identity the larger audience can still appreciate the film if it is well made. Even if the movie is not like the source material (more on that later), if the movie has a vision and executes that vision with confidence, it’s rarely a “bad” movie. Having a vision worked with Nolan’s Batman trilogy. Are there complaints about how it deviated from the source material (by making it extremely grounded and science-based)? Sure, you can find complaints online, but the proof is in the pudding: Nolan turned a dead franchise into a billion(s) dollar enterprise. On the other side of the coin there is Jon Favreau and his MCU-defining Iron Man movie. Favreau went into the movie knowing exactly what kind of identity it would have and he carried it out perfectly. The reward was a movie that grossed three times was industry analysts were expecting. Having a vision is good, but if the studio fights it (despite the fact that they asked for it) the film will collapse.

    Never mind the fact that you still have to make sure the vision you ask for (and the vision you’re getting) is the one you actually need…

    See page 2 for lesson three…

    Next Page
    1 2

    Share this article:

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit

    Tags

    Comic Book MoviesFantastic FourMarvel

    COMMENTS

    Please read our Commenting Policy before you join in with the discussion.

    Note: If you have email notifications enabled, please check your email spam folders to ensure emails are not missed.

    Subscribe
    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    Notify of
    guest
    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    guest
    1 Comment
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Delsin Rowe
    Delsin Rowe
    6 years ago

    Good article.

    0
    Reply

    You might also like

    • Fantastic 4 Review: Now with random outbursts of anger!

      By Matthew Martin
      | August 10, 2015
    • The narrative road to Batman Arkham Knight

      By Tom Farr
      | April 3, 2015
    • Don’t Compare…because DC isn’t Marvel, and that’s a good thing.

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 26, 2015
    • Marvel’s Phase Four is not just approaching…it’s looming.

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 13, 2015
    • Of gods and pretenders: Why a world distrusting Superman makes perfect sense…for now

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 22, 2015

    FIND THE TOPICS YOU WANT...

    Movie Topics

    Recommended for you

    • REVIEW: Jurassic World Dominion – Here we go again…again

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 12, 2022
    • Three Men and a Baby is still awesome thirty five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 31, 2022
    • REVIEW: Bob’s Burgers The Movie is Bob’s Burgers The Show, which means it’s great

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 28, 2022
    • REVIEW: Top Gun Maverick is a sequel that soars!

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 27, 2022
    • Star Wars: 45 Years Later and the four people who made it happen

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 23, 2022
    • REVIEW: Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is Sam Raimi’s Sam Ramiest movie in ages!

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 7, 2022
    • Can a Legend of Zelda movie work?

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 6, 2022
    • The big movies of 2022

      By Matthew Martin
      | January 18, 2022
    • Read the Book Instead: The most disappointing book-to-film adaptations

      By Oliver Johnston
      | September 20, 2021
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Affiliate Disclosure
    • Cookie Policy and Settings
    • Terms of Use
    • Photo Credits
    • RSS
    All Cult of Whatever articles, logos, illustrations and graphics are copyright CultOfWhatever.com. All other trademarks, logos and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. © 2021 CultOfWhatever. All Rights Reserved.
    • facebook
    • twitter
    wpDiscuz