• Home
  • Movies
  • Music
  • TV
  • Video Games
  • Wrestling
  • Topics
  • Latest Comments on Cult of Whatever
Search
Cult of Whatever logo
  • Movies
    Featured
    • The Living Daylights: Timothy Dalton as James Bond

      The Living Daylights is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 28, 2022
      Movie Blogs
    Recent
    • The Muppet Christmas Carol: Michael Caine as Scrooge

      The Muppet’s Christmas Carol remains the gold standard for the book

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 20, 2022
    • Nightmare Before Christmas 1993 1

      2022’s Christmas Movie Watchlist!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 18, 2022
    • Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio Poster

      REVIEW: GDT’s Pinocchio is my favorite film of the year!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 14, 2022
    • Troll: Ine Marie Wilmann as Nora

      REVIEWS: TROLL and TROLL HUNTER -A giant creature double feature!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 5, 2022
    • Harry with The Hendersons

      Harry and the Hendersons is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2022
    • Fantastic Four Poster

      The five best “rogues galleries” in superherodom! (part 3)

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 28, 2022
  • Music
    Random
    • Michael Jackson Bad 2

      BAD is Michael Jackson's best album. Period.

      By Matthew Martin
      | August 31, 2017
      Music Blogs
    Recent
    • The Beatles: Get Back

      What GET BACK reveals about the Beatles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 15, 2021
    • Simon And Garfunkel at Feyenoord Stadium in Rotterdam1982

      The Boxer is a song about being conned

      By Matthew Martin
      | July 4, 2021
    • Lady Gaga: Chromatica Album Cover

      Lady Gaga’s discography is totally out of order

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 3, 2021
    • Michael Jackson Thriller Album Cover

      Thirty years ago music fans said “Nevermind” to Michael Jackson

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 21, 2021
    • Queen II Album Cover

      On Queen’s The Miracle, and the importance of track ordering

      By Matthew Martin
      | February 16, 2021
    • Linda Paul Mccartney 1976

      50 years ago, McCartney dropped “Lennon” and went solo…

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 5, 2020
  • TV
    Featured
    • Big Sky S03e05: Kylie Bunbury, J. Anthony Pena and Katheryn Winnick as Cassie Dewell, Mo Poppernak and Jenny Hoyt

      Big Sky S03E05 Review: Flesh and Blood - Glamping!

      By Salome G
      | October 22, 2022
      TV Blogs
    Recent
    • Big Sky S03e10: Gang

      Big Sky S03E10 Review: A Thin Layer of Rock – Break time…

      By Salome G
      | December 11, 2022
    • Rick And Morty: S01e03

      Is Beth from Rick and Morty a bigger sociopath than Rick?

      By Jason Collins
      | December 7, 2022
    • Big Sky S03e09: Dedee Pfeiffer and Cree as Denise and Emily

      Big Sky S03E09: Where There’s Smoke There’s Fire – Stalling

      By Salome G
      | December 1, 2022
    • The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special: Dave Bautista and Pom Klementieff as Drax and Mantis

      REVIEW: The GOTG Holiday Special is a sweet prelude to next year’s finale

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 27, 2022
    • The Midnight Club S01: The Gang

      The Midnight Club S1 Review – A series of unfortunate events

      By Salome G
      | November 24, 2022
    • Big Sky S03e08: Reba McEntire as Sunny Barnes

      Big Sky S03E08 Review: Duck Hunting – I love a weirdo.

      By Salome G
      | November 19, 2022
  • Video Games
    Featured
    • Arkham Knight

      Batman: Arkham Knight - A fitting end to a trilogy

      By Tom Farr
      | July 18, 2015
      Video Game Reviews
    Recent
    • Splatoon 3 Screenshot

      A trio of Nintendo Switch reviews!

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 28, 2022
    • Nintendo Switch Logo

      Looking ahead to the Switch 2: Predictions and Wants

      By Matthew Martin
      | August 15, 2022
    • Legend Of Zelda

      Can a Legend of Zelda movie work?

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 6, 2022
    • Super Mario 64

      Which system had the better launch: A battle of four Nintendo consoles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2021
    • Luigi's Mansion

      Happy twentieth to Nintendo’s underrated gem, the Gamecube

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 18, 2021
    • Metroid Dread

      Metroid Dread – Post Game analysis and sequel needs

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 29, 2021
  • Wrestling
    Featured
    • AEW All Out 2022: Keith Lee. Anthony Bowens, Max Caster and Billy Gunn

      AEW All Out 2022 - Review and (wild) Speculation!

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 5, 2022
      AEW
    Recent
    • WWE WrestleMania 38: Cody Rhodes vs. Seth Rollins

      Was 2022 the wildest year in wrestling history?

      By Matthew Martin
      | January 4, 2023
    • AEW Full Gear 2022: Young Bucks and Kenny Omega Elite Entrance

      AEW Full Gear 2022 – A needed reset at the end of a tough year

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 22, 2022
    • WWE Survivor Series 1997: Bret Hart

      The Montreal Screwjob – Twenty Five Years Later

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 8, 2022
    • AEW Grand Slam 2022: Jungle Boy and Rey Fenix

      AEW GRANDSLAM 2022 showcased the present and future of the promotion

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 25, 2022
    • AEW All Out 2022: CM Punk

      AEW All Out Fall Out: All the CM Punk drama that’s fit to print!

      By Matthew Martin
      | September 5, 2022
    • AEW Dark: Ricky Starks (22/09/20)

      The future of the AEW World Championship

      By Matthew Martin
      | August 14, 2022
  • Topics
    • site logo
    Latest
    • Was 2022 the wildest year in wrestling history?
    • The Muppet's Christmas Carol remains the gold standard for the book
    • 2022's Christmas Movie Watchlist!
    • REVIEW: GDT's Pinocchio is my favorite film of the year!
    • Big Sky S03E10 Review: A Thin Layer of Rock - Break time...
    • Is Beth from Rick and Morty a bigger sociopath than Rick?

    Lesson learned: Four observations from the Fantastic Four fallout

    By Matthew Martin
    | August 30, 2015
    Movie Blogs
    Previous Page

    LESSON THREE: GRIT AND DARK FOR THE SAKE OF IT IS NOT THE ANSWER

    To go back to Chris Nolan’s Batman movies: As mentioned, those movies worked, despite some deviations from the source material, because the director had the confidence to tell a particular kind of movie, and also had the skill to tell it well. Trank had the confidence, but he lacked the skill. It didn’t help that Warner Bros. was supportive of Nolan while Fox undercut Trank at every opportunity, but still, the F4 director did not have the skill to make this very un-Fantastic Four-like movie rise above its deviations from the original property. That much is clear in just watching the opening two acts (the part the studio altered the least). You can see clearly the kind of movie the director is going for, but that doesn’t change the fact that the movie itself is slow, meandering, thin in character development and more.

    Fantastic Four is Marvel’s most upbeat and light-hearted property. It’s a true “family” of heroes, that wear their emotions on their sleeves, have huge interstellar adventures, but also ride around in something called a “Fantasticar.” It’s goofy, silly, even campy. But it is what it is and its fans appreciate it. Now you can argue that its campy nature makes it a hard sell to a wider cinematic audience, and if that’s the case then you can always approach an adaptation through the lens of its very somber villain. Not every F4 story is “Batman ’66.” There is depth to it, but that darkness is always offered as a clear contrast to the preferred light-hearted nature of the property.

    Fox wanted a “Fox comic book movie” sort of movie. They weren’t interested in telling a “dark Dr. Doom story” as a movie. They just wanted “grit” and “shadows” and “dark” and “brooding” because they still belong to that old 1990’s mentality that doesn’t respect comic properties at face value. Fox looked at X-Men (a franchise that is wildly different in tone) and thought “Let’s just do that, but with different heroes.” The studio’s latest foolhardy idea of combining X-Men and F4’s cinematic universes into one shared universe is further proof that they have no idea what they’re doing. Those two properties rarely mixed in the comics because they have such vastly different tones. Fox is putting them together solely based on the fact that they have the rights to both, and that “shared universes are in!” It goes back to that desire to copy the latest trend.

    When Trank pitched F4 as he would do it, I’m sure he mentioned how dark and brooding it was, and I’m sure that made the studio very happy (“After all, X-Men is a big hit and it’s dark and brooding!”), as though all comic book properties are the same, and all comic book fans want the same things from all comic books. What Fox and Trank failed to understand was, they didn’t create the F4 franchise. They were adapting it. If your franchise is light, the adaptation needs to be light. If it is big in scope, the adaptation needs to be big in scope.

    Don’t try to shoehorn a franchise into an unrelated look or a style. Adapt the material…

    LESSON FOUR: PEOPLE WANT THE SOURCE MATERIAL

    The biggest complaint about the Fantastic Four movie that I have seen, and which I echo, has nothing to do with the rushed third act or the thin characterizations, or the poor editing. It’s the fact that the movie never felt like a Fantastic Four movie. It didn’t look like one, sound like one, act like one, or even—seemingly—desire to be one. It was a movie that seemed embarrassed that it had to attach itself to a comic property. Actors were told not to read the comics to find inspiration for their characters. One actor also mocked the look and feel of the comics and lauded their superior (gritty and dark) suits as opposed to the bright and cheerful blue and white suits so famous on the colored page.

    In 2015, in this golden age of comic book adaptations, that’s a foolish and backwards sort of viewpoint for a movie to take. You can argue that a blue jumpsuit-wearing Mr. Fantastic would look silly in a modern movie. You can argue it. But you’d be wrong.

    Captain America

    Very very wrong.

    What I would argue is that a grim and gritty take on Mr. Fantastic is what is silly. Seeing this guy

    Fantastic Four Mr

    Stretch his arms around while (barely) fighting Dr. Doom…THAT’S silly. It didn’t work because it was too jarring. He’s all serious and stern in his black space suit, and then suddenly he’s Stretch Armstrong swinging around like Bionic Commando. It didn’t work. The tone betrayed the story. Fantastic Four, on the page, has the tone that is does because it’s silly and goofy and campy. It’s characters are “stretchy man” “invisible woman” “on fire guy” and “giant rock dude.” They fight a metal-faced green robed sorcerer. This isn’t Schindler’s List!

    People rejected this movie outright for a lot of reasons, never even bothering to show up. But some people did show up…and then never went back…and told their friends to stay away. Those were the ones who saw a movie that looked nothing like what they grew up reading, so they didn’t bother giving it more than one (miserable) screening. They saw a movie that seemed insulted to wear the name, so the fans were insulted that they had to pay for it.

    If you don’t have respect for what you are adapting, there’s no sense even adapting it.

    __________

    It’s funny: In the wake of F4’s epic failure, another Fox comic book movie has flown under the radar, and it just happens to be one of the most faithful (at least at first glance) adaptations to a comic property ever:

    Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.

    YouTube privacy policy

    If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.

    …and that was the PG-13 version of the trailer. The R-rated version promises that the foul-mouthed, ultra-violent, wise-cracking anti-hero will be exactly as he is presented on the pages of Marvel’s comic books. The same studio that seems to have nailed Deadpool, seems to have no idea what to do with Fantastic Four. Why?

    The reason is two fold: Cost and concern. Deadpool is probably going to cost half what F4’s budget ran (before the massive reshoots and such), likewise because the cost is low the studio simply isn’t as invested in its success or failure. A low budget means the movie can appeal to the hardcore audience, make its money back in theaters and then make a nice profit on home video. With Fantastic Four, the cost was higher, so the studio was compelled to be more hands on. They had more of an investment in the success of the film. That’s ironic, because the more hands-on a studio gets in these movies, the worse the usually turn out to be…

    Sony insisted that Sam Raimi add Venom to Spider-Man 3. The result was a shoe-horned in character than didn’t get the proper respect such a beloved villain deserved. The movie suffered critically for it, and ended up killing the franchise (for a time).

    Warners insisted that Joel Schumacher think about merchandise, toy business and the kiddie market when making Batman and Robin. The result was a movie considered—depending on your thoughts on Fantastic Four—the worst comic book movie of all time. It ended up killing the franchise (for a time).

    Sony (again) insisted that Marc Webb add more and more villains (again) to his Amazing Spider-Man 2, because the studio was thinking of expanding the franchise to include a villains-only movie. The result was a bloated, CGI-heavy film that took an okay concept from the first movie and went in the opposite direction. It ended up killing the franchise (again…for a time).

    Even Marvel has been known as a hands-on sort of studio, most famously in the case of Ant-Man, but also with their fight with Joss Whedon regarding the final cut of Age of Ultron. But in Marvel’s case, they follow the older Hollywood model where the executive producer is really the brains behind the film (or in this case, the universe of films) and the directors come and go as needed to suit the larger picture.

    There are exceptions to all of this. Warners wisely stepped in and stopped Burton’s Superman Lives becuase it was too out there for the franchise. Later they gave Bryan Singer whatever he wanted in making Superman Returns. They didn‘t interfere and the movie was released to a tepid response. In addition Fox has largely been hands off with Singer and the X-Men movies, allowing him to do things his way and rake in the money those films bring in. Fox also ruined Planet of the Apes with the early 2000’s reboot of the franchise, only to redeem themselves with the recent films that (gasp) approached the franchise with respect for the material.

    The lesson that needs to be learned is that a comic book movie is not going to sell itself. You need a studio willing to adapt the material appropriately, by hiring a director with the desire to do just that. Then, get out of his way and let him.

    Fox failed on all fronts and thus, so did their movie.

    Previous Page
    1 2

    Share this article:

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit

    Tags

    Comic Book MoviesFantastic FourMarvel

    COMMENTS

    Please read our Commenting Policy before you join in with the discussion.

    Note: If you have email notifications enabled, please check your email spam folders to ensure emails are not missed.

    Subscribe
    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    Notify of
    guest

    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    guest

    1 Comment
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Delsin Rowe
    Delsin Rowe
    7 years ago

    Good article.

    0
    Reply

    You might also like

    • Fantastic 4 Review: Now with random outbursts of anger!

      By Matthew Martin
      | August 10, 2015
    • The narrative road to Batman Arkham Knight

      By Tom Farr
      | April 3, 2015
    • Don’t Compare…because DC isn’t Marvel, and that’s a good thing.

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 26, 2015
    • Marvel’s Phase Four is not just approaching…it’s looming.

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 13, 2015
    • Of gods and pretenders: Why a world distrusting Superman makes perfect sense…for now

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 22, 2015

    FIND THE TOPICS YOU WANT...

    Movie Topics

    Recommended for you

    • REVIEW: GDT’s Pinocchio is my favorite film of the year!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 14, 2022
    • REVIEWS: TROLL and TROLL HUNTER -A giant creature double feature!

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 5, 2022
    • Harry and the Hendersons is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2022
    • The five best “rogues galleries” in superherodom! (part 3)

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 28, 2022
    • Spirited Away remains Studio Ghibli’s “greatest” film

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 16, 2022
    • Read the Book Instead: The most disappointing book-to-film adaptations

      By Oliver Johnston
      | September 20, 2021
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Affiliate Disclosure
    • Cookie Policy and Settings
    • Terms of Use
    • Photo Credits
    • RSS
    All Cult of Whatever articles, logos, illustrations and graphics are copyright CultOfWhatever.com. All other trademarks, logos and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. © 2021 CultOfWhatever. All Rights Reserved.
    • facebook
    • twitter
    wpDiscuz
    x
    x