• Home
  • Movies
  • Music
  • TV
  • Video Games
  • Wrestling
  • Topics
  • Latest Comments
Search
Cult of Whatever logo
  • Movies
    Featured
    • The Living Daylights: Timothy Dalton as James Bond

      The Living Daylights is still awesome, thirty-five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 28, 2022
      Movie Blogs
    Recent
    • Elvis: Austin Butler

      REVIEW: ELVIS beautifully mythologizes the King of Rock and Roll

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 25, 2022
    • The Black Phone: Ethan Hawke as The Grabber

      REVIEW: THE BLACK PHONE is a flat, dull, rushed non-horror movie

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 25, 2022
    • Jurassic World Dominion Logo

      REVIEW: Jurassic World Dominion – Here we go again…again

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 12, 2022
    • Three Men and a Baby: Tom Selleck and Ted Danson

      Three Men and a Baby is still awesome thirty five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 31, 2022
    • The Bob's Burgers Movie Poster

      REVIEW: Bob’s Burgers The Movie is Bob’s Burgers The Show, which means it’s great

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 28, 2022
    • Top Gun Maverick: Tom Cruise

      REVIEW: Top Gun Maverick is a sequel that soars!

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 27, 2022
  • Music
    Random
    • The Beatles: Get Back

      What GET BACK reveals about the Beatles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 15, 2021
      Music Blogs
    Recent
    • Simon And Garfunkel at Feyenoord Stadium in Rotterdam1982

      The Boxer is a song about being conned

      By Matthew Martin
      | July 4, 2021
    • Lady Gaga: Chromatica Album Cover

      Lady Gaga’s discography is totally out of order

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 3, 2021
    • Michael Jackson Thriller Album Cover

      Thirty years ago music fans said “Nevermind” to Michael Jackson

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 21, 2021
    • Queen II Album Cover

      On Queen’s The Miracle, and the importance of track ordering

      By Matthew Martin
      | February 16, 2021
    • Linda Paul Mccartney 1976

      50 years ago, McCartney dropped “Lennon” and went solo…

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 5, 2020
    • Beatles Usa 1964

      50 years ago the Beatles said “The End”

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 31, 2019
  • TV
    Featured
    • Nancy Drew S03e01: Kennedy McMann as Nancy

      Nancy Drew S03E01 Review: The Warning of the Frozen Heart - Uh-oh!

      By Salome G
      | October 10, 2021
      TV Blogs
    Recent
    • Roswell, New Mexico S04e03: Sibongile Mlambo, Lily Cowles and Michael Trevino as Anatsa, Isobel and Kyle

      Roswell, New Mexico S04E03 Review: Subterranean Homesick Alien – Treading water?

      By Salome G
      | June 23, 2022
    • Obi-Wan Kenobi Series: Ewan McGregor and Vivien Lyra Blair as Obi-Wan and Leia

      REVIEW: Obi-Wan Kenobi had a good season and little else

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 22, 2022
    • Evil S03e02: Sohina Sidhu and Aasif Mandvi as Karima and Ben Shakir

      Evil S03E02 Review: The Demon of Memes – Delightfully creepy

      By Salome G
      | June 20, 2022
    • Dark Winds S01e02: Jessica Matten as Bernadette Manuelito

      Dark Winds S01E02 Review: The Male Rain Approaches – Loose threads

      By Salome G
      | June 20, 2022
    • Riverdale S06e17: Madelaine Petsch, Camila Mendes and Lili Reinhart as Cheryl, Veronica and Betty

      Riverdale S06E17 Review: American Psychos – Bored

      By Salome G
      | June 18, 2022
    • Star Trek Strange New Worlds S01e06: Ian Ho and Husein Madhavji as First Servant and Elder Gamal

      Star Trek: Strange New Worlds – Episodes 6-7 review (the best and the not-so best)

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 18, 2022
  • Video Games
    Featured
    • Arkham Knight

      Batman: Arkham Knight - A fitting end to a trilogy

      By Tom Farr
      | July 18, 2015
      Video Game Reviews
    Recent
    • Legend Of Zelda

      Can a Legend of Zelda movie work?

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 6, 2022
    • Super Mario 64

      Which system had the better launch: A battle of four Nintendo consoles

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 1, 2021
    • Luigi's Mansion

      Happy twentieth to Nintendo’s underrated gem, the Gamecube

      By Matthew Martin
      | November 18, 2021
    • Metroid Dread

      Metroid Dread – Post Game analysis and sequel needs

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 29, 2021
    • Mario Headphones

      The SNES Turns 30: A look at some of the system’s best soundtracks

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 22, 2021
    • Metroid Dread Poster

      REVIEW: Metroid Dread reawakens the old gamer in me

      By Matthew Martin
      | October 11, 2021
  • Wrestling
    Featured
    • Wwe Payback 2017 Poster 2

      Your SO OF COURSE preview of WWE Payback 2017

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 30, 2017
      WWE Blogs
    Recent
    • AEW Double or Nothing 2022: CM Punk vs Adam Page

      REVIEW: AEW Double or Nothing 2022 delivered an up-and-down show

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 30, 2022
    • MJF on AEW Dynamite 17th November 2021

      Getting AEW to the next level…

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 29, 2022
    • Raw 210501: Triple H and Stephanie McMahon

      May 21, 2001 – A (forgotten) date that will live in WWE infamy

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 20, 2022
    • WWE WrestleMania 39 Logo

      Your WAY TOO EARLY predictions for WWE WrestleMania 39!

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 20, 2022
    • WWE WrestleMania 38 Poster

      Your SO OF COURSE preview of WWE WRESTLEMANIA 38!

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 30, 2022
    • Wrestlemania 31 Paige Aj Lee 2

      BOOK REVIEW: The Women of WrestleMania is a balanced take on an under-valued slice of history

      By Matthew Martin
      | March 16, 2022
  • Topics
    • site logo
    Latest
    • REVIEW: ELVIS beautifully mythologizes the King of Rock and Roll
    • REVIEW: THE BLACK PHONE is a flat, dull, rushed non-horror movie
    • Roswell, New Mexico S04E03 Review: Subterranean Homesick Alien - Treading water?
    • REVIEW: Obi-Wan Kenobi had a good season and little else
    • Evil S03E02 Review: The Demon of Memes - Delightfully creepy
    • Dark Winds S01E02 Review: The Male Rain Approaches - Loose threads
    • Latest Comments

    Does a Star Wars trilogy need to be planned out in advance?

    By Matthew Martin
    | February 9, 2020
    Movie Blogs

    Star Wars Opener

    Probably the most common complaint with regards to Disney’s “Sequel Trilogy” of Star Wars films concerns the supposed lack of a central, cohesive story being told over the three films. Kathleen Kennedy apparently gave her three writers (initially JJ Abrams/Lawrence Kasdan, Rian Johnson, and Colin Trevorrow) carte blanche to do whatever they wanted with the story, and that level of freedom has been a source of great angst amongst many Star Wars fans.

    In fact, it might be the most common complaint to be found on both sides of the biggest divide in the fanbase; those who think The Last Jedi was a minor masterpiece and those who would just as soon strike it from canon are often found having common ground on the idea that “the trilogy should have been planned out from the beginning.”

    Is that really necessary, though?

    Did this trilogy need to be mapped out ahead of time? Or, to put it another way, was the trilogy’s perceived failure ultimately attributable to the lack of a story-trajectory being set in stone back in 2014 or so?

    In my opinion, no. The trilogy did not need to be mapped out in detail or even have the major themes and character arcs understood on day one. My reasoning for that belief is two-fold.

    First, lots of great stories—told over multiple installments—are written on the fly.

    Star Trek Deep Space Nine Improbable Cause

    There are varying degrees to consider here. On the one hand is a trilogy like Back to the Future, which was originally conceived as a single story and then, when the time came for a sequel, the two follow-up films were written and shot back-to-back. Nevertheless, the way the latter two films flesh out and play off of the original shows that a multi-part story can be told at least somewhat on the fly.

    On the TV side of things there’s Battlestar Galactica and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, both of which featured long-developing character and plot arcs that climaxed in epic finales, neither of which were mapped out ahead of time. The former show is, admittedly, criticized for the payoff to its storylines, but there’s no denying the show’s ability to have top-notch writing without a roadmap.

    Even more acclaimed is Breaking Bad, which was made with the flimsiest of ideas at the core: “Mr. Chips becomes Scarface.” Every moment, big and small, was made on the fly and even characters who ended up being critical to the show—such as Jesse—were originally expected to be killed off within the first few episodes.

    And then there’s The Lord of the Rings, which was written so much on the fly that Tolkien apparently wrote until he reached a dead-end, then threw fifty or so manuscript pages out and started over, letting the story simply go wherever his imagination took him.

    In short, countless great stories have been told on the fly, with minimal (or even no) major planning being done ahead of time.

    Second, previous Star Wars trilogies are proof that planning things out ahead of time is no guarantee for storyline success.

    Star Wars Luke Skywalker Darth Vader Return Jedi

    Despite long-held protestations to the contrary, the original Star Wars trilogy was not planned out by George Lucas in the mid-’70s. Some even allege that he had the whole six-film saga (or was it nine? or twelve? the story changes depending on when its told) planned out in remarkable detail before he ever wrote A New Hope (which wasn’t even called A New Hope until 1981).

    In truth, Lucas had a story about a princess, a farm boy, a pirate, and a couple of wizards, all in the vein of Flash Gordon. Naturally, he had to think about character backstories, but in the mid-’70s that meant something like this:

    Luke – farm boy, dad killed by evil wizard, yearns for adventure

    Old wizard – former teacher of evil wizard, offers to train Luke

    Evil wizard – works for the bad guys, wears a special breathing mask because he fought the old wizard and fell into a volcano

    Empire/Emperor – rose from a democratic republic, corrupt politicians took too much power, etc.

    It was hardly a detailed synopsis of Attack of the Clones.

    Star Wars was just that: Star Wars. It was a one and done whiz-bang space adventure made when Lucas failed to get the rights to Flash Gordon. No one expected it to be a success, least of all George, but when it was he set his sights on a sequel. To be fair, there was a tremendous amount of good luck here: Vader living at the end of the movie, and Obi Wan’s hesitation when asked how Luke’s father died became unintentional seeds to build the next two movies around, but it was never intended to be a series.

    The Empire Strikes Back was written by Lawrence Kasdan, after Leigh Brackett’s initial script was rejected. Vader being Luke’s dad was a late addition to the writing process. Return of the Jedi’s development is even more interesting: The idea of a Star Wars TRILOGY wasn’t a thing until just before Return of the Jedi. Lucas had initially planned (after Empire) for the series to be an ongoing one. He likes to talk today about how Star Wars is a “generational story” but that’s merely a reflection of what it became (or, at worst, revisionist history).

    Return of the Jedi was never to be the end of the story of Luke and Vader; the sequel to Empire was supposed to focus on the rescue of Han and climax with a second Vader vs Luke fight, ending with the revelation by Vader that Luke has a sister (not Leia). Future movies would have been about finding that long-lost Skywalker, defeating (or redeeming) Vader, and taking down the Emperor. After Lucas got burned out and wanted to end Star Wars he smashed his future ideas together (little more than a hodgepodge of sentences to form the basis for a final movie.

    People like to say that the Original Trilogy had Lucas “guiding it” but he was just winging it like the rest, and sometimes the best ideas in Star Wars—such as Vader’s identity—weren’t even his!

    Star Wars—the original trilogy—was made by three different directors and written by multiple different writers, without any overarching plan at the outset.

    And it’s fantastic.

    On the other hand, the Prequel Trilogy was mapped out, in pretty thorough detail, in 1994-1995, and they’re rightly considered inferior products to the original three. So, again, a “plan” is not an automatic recipe for success, nor is the lack of one a harbinger of doom.

    I will concede that some great stories are mapped out in excruciating detail. Babylon 5 and Harry Potter are two that come to mind.

    Harry Potter Deathly Hallows P2 Daniel Radcliffe Rupert Grint Ron Weasley Emma Watson Hermione Granger

    The Sequel Trilogy wasn’t mapped out, and it lacked a central voice guiding the whole affair, the way the sprawling MCU has Kevin Feige, but it’s unfair to the whole trilogy to say the whole thing is a failure just because it didn’t have a plan.

    It didn’t need a plan; it needed an ending.

    The sequel trilogy had a compelling, plot-heavy beginning, an emotional, character-heavy middle, and simply needed a climactic and thematic finale. The “failure” (if you will) of the sequel trilogy is in the finale. Had part three stuck the landing, no one would be complaining (with any merit) about a lack of a plan, etc.

    The Force Awakens asks a lot of questions and leaves both the answers and the point of those answers to the subsequent films. That’s what the beginning of a trilogy should do. The Last Jedi answers those questions and then leaves the point of those answers to the final film. That’s what the middle of a trilogy should do.

    Movie three sticks out like a sore thumb because it chose to (1) ignore the answers as given in part two, wherever possible, (2) answer part one’s questions in its own, sometimes contradictory ways, and (3) try to find time to give us the point to those new answers, while still having to (4) pay lip-service to the answers already given. It tried to do too much of all the wrong things and collapsed under its own misguided weight.

    Say what you want about The Last Jedi: You may not have liked the answers it gave to the questions posed in The Force Awakens, but it still took what it was given and crafted a story around it. The Rise of Skywalker did not, and for that, the film suffered…

    and the trilogy as a whole does too.

    Share this article:

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit

    Tags

    Star WarsThe Force AwakensThe Last JediThe Rise of Skywalker

    COMMENTS

    Please read our Commenting Policy before you join in with the discussion.

    Note: If you have email notifications enabled, please check your email spam folders to ensure emails are not missed.

    Subscribe
    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    Notify of
    guest
    Connect withD
    I allow to create an account
    When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
    DisagreeAgree
    guest
    5 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Jim Bergevin Jr
    Jim Bergevin Jr
    2 years ago

    I don’t think it’s a matter of mapping out a plan, but at least one of providing some consistency. The MCU worked well because they had that plan of where they were going and what the end game (pun intended) was going to be. They then let each story stand on its own and told those stories in a way that befit the superhero that was featured. That quite doesn’t work with Star Wars as you have all the main characters featured in each movie, so that’s where consistency becomes of primary importance, and having at least some idea of… Read more »

    Last edited 2 years ago by Kam
    1
    Reply
    Gavin the Binge-Watcher
    Gavin the Binge-Watcher
    2 years ago

    I think a big part of the problem is trying to tell back stories when the characters have already clearly aged and trying to tell sequels with no regard for how many years occurred between the two.

    0
    Reply
    Snarky-Guru
    Snarky-Guru
    2 years ago

    Would it have helped in this instance? Probably not, right? Characters are made of real actors and actresses who might pass away or who might refuse to do the film. I’m not sure planning ahead would’ve helped this one.

    0
    Reply
    Silver
    Silver
    2 years ago

    I think every trilogy needs mapped out beforehand. Otherwise the story tends to get off track. Plot points are dropped, the characters act unusual, and there’s just no continuity. That drives me crazy most of the time.

    0
    Reply
    Snarky-Guru
    Snarky-Guru
    2 years ago
    Reply to  Silver

    Normally I’d agree with this. However, these big productions take so long to film that things change dramatically before the next film can start recording. I think the planning could’ve been better once the director knew what he was working with, but I don’t think it’s possible to map these huge productions out in advance. Not without a standing contract with the main characters – which still won’t help when there’s been an unfortunate death.

    0
    Reply

    You might also like

    • SPOILER-FILLED THOUGHTS: Star Wars – The Rise of Skywalker

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 20, 2019
    • Attack of the Clones and the thin line between serious and silly

      By Matthew Martin
      | December 15, 2015
    • MACHETE: The “other” way to watch Star Wars

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 19, 2015
    • 20 YEARS LATER, THE STAR WARS: EPISODE I TEASER STILL GIVES ME CHILLS

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 29, 2019

    FIND THE TOPICS YOU WANT...

    Movie Topics

    Recommended for you

    • REVIEW: ELVIS beautifully mythologizes the King of Rock and Roll

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 25, 2022
    • REVIEW: THE BLACK PHONE is a flat, dull, rushed non-horror movie

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 25, 2022
    • REVIEW: Jurassic World Dominion – Here we go again…again

      By Matthew Martin
      | June 12, 2022
    • Three Men and a Baby is still awesome thirty five years later

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 31, 2022
    • REVIEW: Bob’s Burgers The Movie is Bob’s Burgers The Show, which means it’s great

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 28, 2022
    • REVIEW: Top Gun Maverick is a sequel that soars!

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 27, 2022
    • Star Wars: 45 Years Later and the four people who made it happen

      By Matthew Martin
      | May 23, 2022
    • Can a Legend of Zelda movie work?

      By Matthew Martin
      | April 6, 2022
    • Read the Book Instead: The most disappointing book-to-film adaptations

      By Oliver Johnston
      | September 20, 2021
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Affiliate Disclosure
    • Cookie Policy and Settings
    • Terms of Use
    • Photo Credits
    • RSS
    All Cult of Whatever articles, logos, illustrations and graphics are copyright CultOfWhatever.com. All other trademarks, logos and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. © 2021 CultOfWhatever. All Rights Reserved.
    • facebook
    • twitter
    wpDiscuz